Correlation Economics Backup

Happy New Year To All Readers!

Just for the sake of documenting it, I have never seen anything like this.

If you have read this post , you will know that the Shanghai premiums to London gold prices are a proxy for higher demand for gold in China. Because when the premium shoots up, the demand in Shanghai shoots up too. Compare the two charts yourself. (Courtesy of Koos Jansen, In Gold We Trust, original post ) Now, we can also do the same for silver. Look at the silver premium chart between Shanghai and London below. I do not even need to know how much the Chinese demand is for silver, because the silver premiums speak for themselves. We call this "the power of deduction". And these peaks in silver premiums magically coincide with a drainage in the SLV trust. Let's see what happens next, will SLV be drained too in the same manner as GLD?

Let's compare the two charts. The first one is the amount of gold withdrawals from Shanghai gold exchange , which can be accessed here . The SGE withdrawal numbers in chart 1 is equal to Chinese imports and Chinese mine supply and is equal to Chinese demand for gold because all the gold is sold through the SGE. Note that January and December are the best months, because the Chinese have New Year in February. Note that in 2014, the SGEI was launched, so a new calculation needs to be implemented. For more info go here . Chart 1:  SGE deliveries  ( original post ) (Courtesy of Koos Janse, In Gold We Trust ) The second chart are the China gold imports. Chart 2: China Net Imports from Hong Kong Now let's put them together. What do you see? Chart 3: Chart 1 + Chart 2 First of all, the amount of gold withdrawn from the SGE is always higher than the net imports from Hong Kong to China. Chart 1 x 4 > Chart 2. That's because SGE covers imports and Chinese mine supply. Second, both...

Remember Marc Faber recommending Vietnam? To go further on the case for investing in Vietnamese stocks in 2014, I wanted to point out several things. First off, the savings rate in Vietnam is extremely high. We have 28% domestic savings rates and that's always a sign of a great economy. You can't produce and invest without savings. Second, the inflation rate has come down from 20% in the past to 6% now. This will be great going forward as the dong (Vietnamese currency) will be stable going forward. Chart 1: Vietnam CPI To point to a correlation on this blog , we know that the currency valuation is correlated to the trade deficit of a country and indeed, when we look at the trade deficit in Vietnam, we can see that Vietnam recently went into a surplus. This also explains why the dong is so strong lately and why the inflation rate is coming down. Chart 2: Trade Deficit Vietnam To read further, go here .

According to the latest data here , November wasn't a good month for China gold imports. Gross imports turned back to their average. Net imports declined a lot more. Although these numbers are lower than usual, they are still higher than what we saw in pre-2008. Let's see what December will bring.

There is a very simple metric to see if it's better to buy or rent a house. Just look at the price to rent ratio. Price to Rent Ratio As you can see, Canada has the highest price to rent ratio in this chart, so it is better to rent than to buy a house in Canada. You can also see that Japanese houses are very cheap, so you could buy a house there. The United States is located on the historical average. My country, Belgium is still very highly priced, so I'm not going to buy a house in Belgium soon. For more charts about Belgium, go here . An additional aspect to look at is the unemployment rate. Countries with a rising unemployment rate typically have a declining housing price index. Let's take a few examples: Italy, Netherlands and Spain. All of them have a declining housing price and all of them have a rising unemployment rate. So buying houses when the housing price is going down is not a good idea as the biggest chunk of your money is going into the price asset of your h...

Today, we have a good example of the importance of correlations. As I noted before in this post , the Bitcoin price is correlated to the amount of unique Bitcoin addresses. If we look at the Bitcoin addresses, it has hit a new low today, since the bursting of the Bitcoin bubble, which I covered here . Amount of Unique Bitcoin Addresses The Bitcoin price on the other hand has not made that new low yet as it would mean that Bitcoin should be going under $500/Bitcoin. But according to our correlation, this is bound to happen soon. Bitcoin Price Let's see if it happens. And by the way. If you think Bitcoin is the best cryptocurrency in the world, then look at Mr. Ripple. A currency I have never heard before and it almost overtook the Bitcoin market capitalization in begin December. All of the people saying that alternative cryptocurrencies don't hurt Bitcoin's price are completely wrong.

As I predicted here and here , both the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen are underperforming the euro. This is mainly because the central bank balance sheets of the U.S. and Japan are inflating, while the balance sheet of the Eurozone is shrinking/flatlined. Central Bank Balance Sheet Expansion is Bad for the Currency Moreover, we see that the Eurozone has a trade surplus while the U.S. and Japan have a trade deficit, which according to this correlation below, is good for the euro and bad for the U.S. dollar and Japanese yen. Deficit is correlated to Currency Valuation At this moment, if all things stay equal, the euro will continue its rise against the U.S. dollar and Japanese yen. An extra catalyst following the asset-quality review (AQR) is that the European banks need to increase capital next year and they will need to buy euros for that. This also means that U.S. and Japanese bonds will continue their decline as following correlation between currency and bond yields suggests. Y...

One of the reasons I'm bullish on emerging market stocks is because they underperformed the U.S. in 2013. But most importantly, the P/E ratio of these emerging market stocks is at all time lows (P/E=11), while the P/E ratio in the U.S. is at 22. This is a valuation of more than double the emerging market stocks. PE ratio I think this underperformance in EM stocks is due to the underperformance of the CRB index as compared to U.S. stocks, which can also be seen here. Stocks went up (yellow line), but the CRB index (orange line) went down. Stocks Vs. CRB Index I believe the CRB index is now in a recovery phase. China's power consumption has been steadily increasing. China Power Consumption That's why I'm bullish on emerging market stocks. If you're not convinced yet, don't believe me, listen to Peter Schiff . To read more, go here .

It shocked me to see what the gold price could do in a few years, taking in account how much the Federal Reserve is printing today. This "tapering" talk is just a way to avert people from seeing the big picture. A must see video: Go ahead and subscribe for free to Mike Maloney's videos, there is a lot of stuff to watch there: http://www.hiddensecretsofmoney.com/videos

Remember the Peter Schiff Walmart video? Now Peter has a new "mafia voice" character.

Unlike some news sites  and other blogs  saying that Friday's 20 December GLD inflow for the first time in six weeks is surprising. I say it's just an anomaly in an ever decreasing GLD ETF. Indeed, the GLD ETF added some tonnage on 20 December... 19-Dec-13 808.72 20-Dec-13 814.12 23-Dec-13 805.72 ...just to lose it all immediately a business day later on 23 December. The reason why I say this is that the gold price is much too low at this stage for the Chinese not to buy the physical gold. Just look at the latest high premiums in Shanghai of 1.5%. So yes, the GLD ETF will continue to get drained unless the gold price goes much higher.

As predicted  two months ago, the copper price has now moved up, because the contango went into backwardation. I'm not too sure about what this massive backwardation in copper means, but as we saw copper go into backwardation these past weeks, the copper price hasn't really moved up as much as I expected. I'm more neutral now on the copper price. We also see that the large commercials have cut their long positions. We'll see where we go from here.

One of the main reasons why I think that tax revenues will not increase anymore is because the people don't have any savings left at this stage. There is a correlation between what the government receives in taxes (blue chart), and the savings rate (red chart). When the savings rate makes a bottom, this coincides with a top in tax revenue. The savings rate just dropped to 4.2% from 4.5% and this will eliminate all hope that tax revenue will continue its increase. What this also means is that the deficit will likely continue to increase. We already see this happening in the budget deficit, which has increased again (yellow chart). An increased deficit will weaken the U.S. dollar and put pressure on U.S. bonds (higher yields). With this information, you can prepare accordingly.

... June 2014. Just a little request from someone to extrapolate the GLD ETF. I wonder if the gold price will hit zero next year. (extrapolation based on the selling pressure after tapering) And as an extra. It has just gotten  worse at the COMEX. Again a new low for registered gold as of today. We lost 12% of registered gold in just 1 day. At this rate, when we extrapolate again, the COMEX is defaulting before the end of the year. They can have all the eligible gold they want, but if there is no registered gold anymore, the game is over. Leverage is skyrocketing exponentially and that's always, always the end of a bubble... In this case the gold suppression bubble.

According to the stock valuation chart, the stock market is now crossing the 115% ratio of total market cap against GNP. Which means we are crossing the border from modestly overvalued into significantly overvalued territory. If global GDP weakens next year, a drop in the stock market will not be far off. Stock Valuation Table In fact, Marc Faber forecasts that the global economy will weaken next year. And this is also confirmed by the declining GDP growth estimates. GDP Estimates

You've got to give Peter credit for this. Higher costs (labor costs or corporate taxes) in a business will always flow to the consumer. Because this is the only way a business can stay profitable. Of course, higher consumer prices are not sustainable, because the consumer won't buy your product. It's all supply and demand. Which means...  ...the other way to stay in business is of course to just fire the employees. See this Salman Khan video:

You know what is very interesting? The registered gold at the COMEX hit a fresh new low. In just 1 day, the COMEX lost 20% of its total physical gold holdings. We are now at a point that the COMEX could default instantly! Eligible to registered gold leverage is now 15, a jump from 11 to 15, just in one day. You tell me if this is going to be sustainable. If we look at open interest, we have 385432 or 38543200 ounces of gold against 490126 ounces of registered gold at the COMEX. That's a leverage of 38543200/490126 = 79. Up from 67 a month ago. On the premium side we still see record silver premiums, both at APMEX and Shanghai: And now even in gold. Here we go Arbitrage Opportunity, you can bet the GLD gets raided now until all the gold at the GLD ETF is gone. Indeed, the GLD ETF is being raided again. And by the way, the GLD outflows mean nothing, when the Chinese buy an ever increasing amount of gold at the same time.

Not macroeconomic news, but I'm pretty proud of this duo concert at JNJ, Beerse/Geel, Belgium, November, 2013.

Total credit market debt growth is correlated with the Dow Jones. As everything in the economy requires loans, credit expansion drives the economy today. Whenever this credit growth stops (blue line drops), the Dow Jones (red line) will go down with it. We have seen this in the 1987, 2000, 2008 crashes. Monitor the blue line as it may be an important indicator.

When you take a look at the latest capacity utilization rate of November, you will see a surge. This means that inflation is indeed coming. Our correlation suggests this. November posted a capacity utilization rate of 79%, the highest since 2008. Make no illusion, the CPI will rise.

We finally went into backwardation in full force on copper the previous week, so I expect rising copper prices soon. Copper miners are also bottoming out, take a look at Freeport-McMoRan and Capstone Mining.

If you haven't had enough, Peter talks about Bitcoin again.

We all know the Unemployment Rate is rigged by the U.S. government. A much better indicator is the Labor Force Participation Rate. Historically, we see a negative correlation between the Labor Force Participation Rate and the Unemployment Rate. Whenever the LFPR goes up (blue chart), we see a decline in the unemployment rate (red chart) and vice versa. This correlation has been true until 2008, where the U.S. government falsified the unemployment numbers and added hedonic adjustments. The red line should be going upwards since 2010 if we include discouraged workers, part-time workers, disabled workers, etc... So, the key is to look at the labor force participation rate. More info here . Labor force participation rate = green circle divided by yellow circle = amount of people who are working or seeking for work For more information, here is a chart with a longer time frame of the labor force participation rate for the working age population (25 - 54 years).

A Zerohedge article made me think about the unemployment rate. Apparently, year over year, the civilian population rose while the labor force declined. You might say: "What does this mean?". Let's first look at this informative video from Salman Khan: The yellow circle is the civilian population, people older than 16+ years, which can be found here : The green circle is the labor force, people who can work (employed + unemployed), which can be found here : This conveniently gives me the labor participation rate by dividing them: (labor force/civilian population): You can see that since 2000, the labor force participation rate has been declining and it is even declining faster after 2008. When the labor force participation rate declines, it becomes more and more difficult to support the economy as a smaller amount of people are working for an increasing population. This will lead to higher deficits, higher taxes, less savings etc... So the labor force participation rate i...